High flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus bilevel positive airway pressure as a mode of oxygen delivery a prospective observational study in patients with pneumonia and hypoxemic respiratory failure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v16i6.4553Keywords:
High-flow nasal cannula; Bilevel positive airway pressure; Oxygen therapy; Pneumonia; Hypoxemic respiratory failure; Non-invasive ventilation; Patient outcomesAbstract
Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) are common non-invasive ventilation strategies, but their comparative effectiveness in oxygenation and patient outcomes remains under investigation.
Aims and Objectives: This study compares the efficacy of HFNC and BiPAP in patients with pneumonia and hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF).
Materials and Methods: Patients with pneumonia and HRF admitted to the intensive care unit or emergency department were assigned to either HFNC or BiPAP based on clinical judgment. Outcomes assessed included oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2), respiratory rate, patient comfort, intubation rates, hospital stay length, and survival.
Results: HFNC and BiPAP showed similar short-term oxygenation improvements. HFNC provided better comfort and ease of use, while BiPAP offered superior ventilation support and respiratory rate reduction. Both methods had comparable intubation rates and hospital stay lengths, though BiPAP may benefit patients with severe distress.
Conclusion: HFNC improved oxygenation and shortened hospital stays, while BiPAP enhanced ventilation. Mortality rates were similar, suggesting both can be used in managing mild acute respiratory distress syndrome, depending on patient needs and available resources.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).